Madonna of Humility

Lorenzo Monaco

1 of 30

Object Label

According to medieval theology, humility was the source of all virtues, an appropriate metaphor for Mary as the Mother of God. In Lorenzo Monaco’s devotional painting Mary is depicted as the Madonna of Humility, seated not on a throne but on a cushion resting on a marble pavement. Pictures like this were in high demand in Florence, and Monaco made several similar versions of this composition, likely for private patrons.

Caption

Lorenzo Monaco Italian, School of Florence, ca. 1370/71–1424. Madonna of Humility, ca. 1415–1420. Tempera and tooled gold on panel with engaged frame, 33 1/4 x 18 7/8 in. (84.5 x 47.9 cm) Frame: 45 3/4 x 26 3/4 x 5 3/4 in. (116.2 x 67.9 x 14.6 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Gift of Mary Babbott Ladd, Lydia Babbott Stokes, and Frank L. Babbott, Jr. in memory of their father Frank L. Babbott, 34.842. No known copyright restrictions (Photo: Brooklyn Museum, 34.842_overall_black_PS22.jpg)

Gallery

Not on view

Collection

European Art

Title

Madonna of Humility

Date

ca. 1415–1420

Geography

Place made: Italy

Medium

Tempera and tooled gold on panel with engaged frame

Classification

Painting

Dimensions

33 1/4 x 18 7/8 in. (84.5 x 47.9 cm) Frame: 45 3/4 x 26 3/4 x 5 3/4 in. (116.2 x 67.9 x 14.6 cm)

Inscriptions

On base of frame: "AVE MARIA GRATIA PLENA D." [Hail Mary Full of Grace]

Credit Line

Gift of Mary Babbott Ladd, Lydia Babbott Stokes, and Frank L. Babbott, Jr. in memory of their father Frank L. Babbott

Accession Number

34.842

Rights

No known copyright restrictions

This work may be in the public domain in the United States. Works created by United States and non-United States nationals published prior to 1923 are in the public domain, subject to the terms of any applicable treaty or agreement. You may download and use Brooklyn Museum images of this work. Please include caption information from this page and credit the Brooklyn Museum. If you need a high resolution file, please fill out our online application form (charges apply). The Museum does not warrant that the use of this work will not infringe on the rights of third parties, such as artists or artists' heirs holding the rights to the work. It is your responsibility to determine and satisfy copyright or other use restrictions before copying, transmitting, or making other use of protected items beyond that allowed by "fair use," as such term is understood under the United States Copyright Act. The Brooklyn Museum makes no representations or warranties with respect to the application or terms of any international agreement governing copyright protection in the United States for works created by foreign nationals. For further information about copyright, we recommend resources at the United States Library of Congress, Cornell University, Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums, and Copyright Watch. For more information about the Museum's rights project, including how rights types are assigned, please see our blog posts on copyright. If you have any information regarding this work and rights to it, please contact copyright@brooklynmuseum.org.

Frequent Art Questions

  • Any egg tempera paintings?

    Oh, let me look into that! Are you an artist? I have found that artists are often interested in materials.
    Sort of! I just came from the library and saw some really amazing egg tempera paintings.
    Many of the religious paintings in the Beaux-Arts Court, where you are, were painted with tempera. In the Renaissance-era, tempera was mixed with egg and that material practice has been used actually since ancient Egypt through the Renaissance until it was eventually replaced with oil paints.
    Oh! Awesome! Why was it replaced?
    Mainly because the effects that can be achieved with oil paints are much greater than with tempera. Artists could achieve more color, depth and contrasts with oil. Oil takes much longer to dry allowing the artist to continually make changes and add layers of color. The surface is often brighter.
  • How can we be sure that we are interpreting the meaning of the symbols correctly? Languages change and words are lost/modified - Are these meaning we derive usually best guesses or do we have concrete links?

    That is, actually, quite a big issue for the Catholic Church throughout the Medieval and Renaissance period: How can we be sure the people understand what we want them to understand? Well, to achieve that, they made their stories and figures appear super simple and almost symbol-like! Blue coat, then, "equals" Mary, spotting a gold finch "equals" Jesus, and so on. You can think of these symbols almost like traffic signs - you want to make sure you keep them as simple as possible, because misunderstanding the message can lead to potential trouble.
  • Tell me more.

    The “Madonna of Humility” type is characterized by the Virgin sitting on the ground or, as we see here, on a cushion. She is presented as quite literally down-to-earth and therefore relatable.
    The artist’s name, Lorenzo Monaco, means Lorenzo the Monk and he was indeed a member of the clergy in Florence. He eventually left monastic life to establish a painting workshop, but he maintained the role of deacon.

Have information?

Have information about an artwork? Contact us at

bkmcollections@brooklynmuseum.org.